Hadi Vakili; Parisa Goudarzi
Volume 5, Issue 3 , November 2014, , Pages 101-126
Abstract
Discussing the linguistic and logical nature of mystical paradoxes, analyzing the content of such statements, and opening their hidden secrets, is a new perspective of historical and scientific confronting to this phenomenon. Almost all the works that have been written for or against these paradoxes, ...
Read More
Discussing the linguistic and logical nature of mystical paradoxes, analyzing the content of such statements, and opening their hidden secrets, is a new perspective of historical and scientific confronting to this phenomenon. Almost all the works that have been written for or against these paradoxes, where they are dealt with rational denial or defend of the paradoxes and there are signs of some sorts of logical justification or un-justification to deny or accept these words and expressions, by rationality and logic they mean Aristotelian rationality and Aristotle two-valued logic. Although the problems stem from contradictory or paradoxical nature of the expressions, it is un-reasonable to resolve these problems in Aristotelian logic but we need another logic. Fuzzy logic is such a logic, to which, as we shall show, the defenders of paradoxes unconsciously have indicated. But the narrow limits of intellectual peripatetic framework and Aristotelian logic and adherence to their laws and rules throughout the history, have not allowed thinkers, even the most prominent researchers in this field including Stace, to get rid of the dark and narrow framework of this logic
Parisa Goudarzi
Volume 4, Issue 4 , July 2014, , Pages 79-98
Abstract
Qûnawî in his interpretation of Sura Fatiha, maintains that the God’s absolute being is a developing absoluteness of His Being without Qualification and free from the shackles of the composition and plurality. In his view this being is a mere existence, not a plurality, not a hybrid, ...
Read More
Qûnawî in his interpretation of Sura Fatiha, maintains that the God’s absolute being is a developing absoluteness of His Being without Qualification and free from the shackles of the composition and plurality. In his view this being is a mere existence, not a plurality, not a hybrid, not adjective, not descriptive, no name, and no formal, no relation, no predication, it is just a pure existence. Fanaari, the commentator of Miftaah al-qaib, considers His existence as an absolute one without any valid adverbial, though it can be taken with or without constraints. However, the discussion is not unconditional although derived bound constraint is applied. Qûnawî provides five arguments to prove that the Necessary Being is the Absolute, and then discusses some doubts and criticisms which have been presented against the proofs. Imam Al-Khomeini in his commentating on Mesbah, seeks to answer the problems. He argue that except the first three arguments, the other arguments don’t establish the claim, so he rejects them and thinks that the main mistake and fault of the invalid arguments are the confusion between concept and extension, the primary essential predication and common technical predication, the conceptual meaning and external reality, and between absolute being and being as a being
Hadi Vakili; Parisa Goudarzi; Mahbube Amani
Volume 3, Issue 1 , September 2012, , Pages 141-152
Abstract
The study of Two Minds scholar and Imam Khomeini's views on Four Journeys, given the similarities between the two views at the same time, there are also differences. Imam and Qomshei both see the origin of the first trip as the created existents but unlike Qomshei who introduced the destination of the ...
Read More
The study of Two Minds scholar and Imam Khomeini's views on Four Journeys, given the similarities between the two views at the same time, there are also differences. Imam and Qomshei both see the origin of the first trip as the created existents but unlike Qomshei who introduced the destination of the trip as the absolute Reality, Imam cosiders it as the qualified Reality. At the second trip, the Imam like Qomshei believe in similar provisions in the tour, vanishing intrinsic qualities and actions, including the necessity of divine grace to withdraw and return to Ananyt destruction of Leishmaniasis, a seeker's journey is outlined. However, as noted in tour, the site of the Imam against Qomshei who knows loss of mortals, for the traveler on this journey, just as the show is doomed. Instead, the trip to visit Imam's absolute right to know and secondly. However real nature and destination of the trip with created clear interpretation are consistent with this interpretation, traveler departing on the trip, his destination as the One and it is his justification for destination variable is the fourth trip. Both believe that the prophecy for the traveler on the trip is a prophetic other legislation because the seeker still no better field facility, descent and has not returned. Imam and Qomshei have most closely resembles in the interpretation of the nature and characteristics of their fourth trip. In terms of both, at first this trip is from created existents to created existents with along with the Real and secondly legislation prophecy has been obtained on this trip fully for the seeker
Hadi Vakili; Parisa Goudarzi; Mahbube Amani; Ali Akbar Ahmadi
Volume 2, Issue 2 , October 2011, , Pages 1-16
Abstract
The present article investigates Mutahhari's "new theology". First, we present Mutahhari's view of theology, according to him, the divine station of God implies that He does have a direct influence upon things, in order words, His creation must be understood as the creation of a divine ordering system. ...
Read More
The present article investigates Mutahhari's "new theology". First, we present Mutahhari's view of theology, according to him, the divine station of God implies that He does have a direct influence upon things, in order words, His creation must be understood as the creation of a divine ordering system. In his new theology (influenced by Judaism and Christianity), God is considered a blind and deaf force, which has no influence upon thing, human destiny being predetermined and unchangeable.
